Many individuals have been spending their time and money in PC gaming as a result of the new stay-at-home lifestyle. While many people are still seeking to build new PCs, others are just upgrading their existing gaming machines. However, due to the current chipset scarcity, it is difficult to obtain the latest and best. The Intel Core i5-10600K is one CPU that might be useful for gamers. Even though Intel’s Comet Lake series has been around for a year, does it still make sense to buy one? Let’s have a look.
The Intel Core i5-10600K CPU costs around Rs. 20,000 and is readily accessible. A pricing like this is ideal for novices who want to keep their CPU budget modest and spend the rest of their money on a powerful GPU. The Core i5 is also in a good location for most of the low-cost Nvidia RTX graphics cards, so it shouldn’t be a problem. Furthermore, there are a lot of different websites including but not limited to the final desktop, from where you can get the best motherboards for i5 10600k, if you are looking for one. But first, you will have to decide whether you want this processor or not then only, you can decide whether to purchase the compatible motherboards or not.
The Intel Core i5-10600K is a great option if you want to construct a gaming setup that can run most games at 1440p with high settings. Sure, you’ll lose out on certain capabilities like PCIe Gen 4, but there aren’t many accessories that support it right now. You may go in with a Z590 motherboard and later change your 10600K for a 11600K or a 11900K as part of future-proofing. Overall, the Intel Core i5-10600K is a wonderful option for all gamers, and it’s still worth purchasing in 2021, especially if you need a gaming PC but can’t afford the Intel Core i5-11600K.
Performance of the Intel Core i5-10600K
The Intel Core i5-10600K was able to sustain a steady clock speed of 4.5GHz on all six cores during our tests. When the applications requested it, the CPU was able to push the clock rates all the way up to 4.7GHz. When the load was removed, it dropped to 800Mhz on the lower side, but I want to be clear that this was not due to any heat difficulties.
This clearly shows that, with appropriate cooling, there is no risk of this processor thermally throttling, at least while operating at factory settings. It’s also worth noting that all of these tests were carried out with the Gigabyte BIOS’s Enhanced Multi-Core Performance option enabled. In terms of synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scored 9014 points in the multi-core test of Cinbench R23. This places the CPU just below the Intel Core i9-9880H and ahead of the Ryzen 7 1700X. The test bench scored 9733 in 3D Mark’s Time Spy benchmark, and it received a decent 6895 in PC Mark 10.